<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HHO = Oxyhydrogen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/</link>
	<description>Medium for entrepreneurial-related conversations</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ford Tech</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-16494</link>
		<dc:creator>Ford Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-16494</guid>
		<description>Tons of helpful info on HHO can be found at http://www.extremehho.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tons of helpful info on HHO can be found at <a href="http://www.extremehho.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.extremehho.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benzmacx</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14315</link>
		<dc:creator>benzmacx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14315</guid>
		<description>Ok, I didn't realize there was still a discussion on this...

Stanley, I just attempted to point out that the energy has to come from somewhere.  And you attempted to say that it comes from the battery.  Well sure it does!  But what happens when you do not recharge your battery?  Well suddenly there is not more stored energy in it and your little Hydrolysis reaction can no longer work.  Solution - the alternator in your car draws rotational power from the engine and turns it into electric power.

You CANNOT get something for nothing.  Think an alternator's draw is insignificant? My 70amp alternator draws about 2HP.  A modern alternator draws over 5HP.  Any amount of power the draws must be added to that.  It is significant enough where BMW is putting larger batteries in their cars to reduce the time the alternator needs to be on which in turn saves gas. Consider that while cruising at highway speeds your are only using 20-25HP.  You now want to bring that to 30-35HP, a 40 to 50% increase in needed power.  Then factor in the inefficiencies of the ICE and it is even high losses.  I am not saying that this will negatively impact your fuel millage, I am saying that it is probably not worth the investment.  Someone before me figured out some fiancees of the situation but left out set up costs.  Either your time or your money paying someone else to install it.

And you will NEVER break the max. efficiency of an ICE, no matter what games you attempt to play with the fuel/air ratio.

If you would disclose who you worked for for some many years in R&#38;D that would be great.  

EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) does absolutely NOTHING to improve fuel economy!  It is a technology to reduce emissions by running burt fuel/air back into the cylinders to ensure a complete and more ideal burn of the exhaust gasses.

and relying on the big companies to do everything for us is ridiculous.  I think the point of this blog is to show how UNTRUE that is.  Big companies have one thing in mind - What next quarters numbers look like.

Oh, and your MPG is not effected by temperature or altitude as today's cars (going back to the early 80s...  anything with any type of fuel injection really) have Intake Air Temperature (IAT) and Altimeter sensors for metering how much fuel and how much air should be put in the car at any altitude and air temperature.  Your max power will decrease slightly, but MPG will not change in any discernible manner unless you are still sporting a carburetor in which case I must ask why you brought that to a discussion on efficiency?

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I didn&#8217;t realize there was still a discussion on this&#8230;</p>
<p>Stanley, I just attempted to point out that the energy has to come from somewhere.  And you attempted to say that it comes from the battery.  Well sure it does!  But what happens when you do not recharge your battery?  Well suddenly there is not more stored energy in it and your little Hydrolysis reaction can no longer work.  Solution - the alternator in your car draws rotational power from the engine and turns it into electric power.</p>
<p>You CANNOT get something for nothing.  Think an alternator&#8217;s draw is insignificant? My 70amp alternator draws about 2HP.  A modern alternator draws over 5HP.  Any amount of power the draws must be added to that.  It is significant enough where BMW is putting larger batteries in their cars to reduce the time the alternator needs to be on which in turn saves gas. Consider that while cruising at highway speeds your are only using 20-25HP.  You now want to bring that to 30-35HP, a 40 to 50% increase in needed power.  Then factor in the inefficiencies of the ICE and it is even high losses.  I am not saying that this will negatively impact your fuel millage, I am saying that it is probably not worth the investment.  Someone before me figured out some fiancees of the situation but left out set up costs.  Either your time or your money paying someone else to install it.</p>
<p>And you will NEVER break the max. efficiency of an ICE, no matter what games you attempt to play with the fuel/air ratio.</p>
<p>If you would disclose who you worked for for some many years in R&amp;D that would be great.  </p>
<p>EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) does absolutely NOTHING to improve fuel economy!  It is a technology to reduce emissions by running burt fuel/air back into the cylinders to ensure a complete and more ideal burn of the exhaust gasses.</p>
<p>and relying on the big companies to do everything for us is ridiculous.  I think the point of this blog is to show how UNTRUE that is.  Big companies have one thing in mind - What next quarters numbers look like.</p>
<p>Oh, and your MPG is not effected by temperature or altitude as today&#8217;s cars (going back to the early 80s&#8230;  anything with any type of fuel injection really) have Intake Air Temperature (IAT) and Altimeter sensors for metering how much fuel and how much air should be put in the car at any altitude and air temperature.  Your max power will decrease slightly, but MPG will not change in any discernible manner unless you are still sporting a carburetor in which case I must ask why you brought that to a discussion on efficiency?</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14291</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14291</guid>
		<description>There is research paper by JPL from around 1972 in which HHO was used as a combustion exciter.
  
What was done was that when a small quantity of HHO was added to a very lean mixture, the H2 and 02 became free radicals and fully migrated into the combustion mixture and allowed a more complete burn with much lower emissions.

Use as a complete fuel doesn't seem practical, again, as stated by others, because of the conversion energy requirements.  It would seem to violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. 

I believe the address for this information is www.paneacauniversity.com  I'm not sure of that address, or the spelling, so a Google search is probably in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is research paper by JPL from around 1972 in which HHO was used as a combustion exciter.</p>
<p>What was done was that when a small quantity of HHO was added to a very lean mixture, the H2 and 02 became free radicals and fully migrated into the combustion mixture and allowed a more complete burn with much lower emissions.</p>
<p>Use as a complete fuel doesn&#8217;t seem practical, again, as stated by others, because of the conversion energy requirements.  It would seem to violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. </p>
<p>I believe the address for this information is <a href="http://www.paneacauniversity.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.paneacauniversity.com</a>  I&#8217;m not sure of that address, or the spelling, so a Google search is probably in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeVryGuy</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14279</link>
		<dc:creator>DeVryGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 02:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14279</guid>
		<description>I was very intrigued at first at the pssibilities of HHO gas for vehiculiar transporation as a way to convert or modify existing ICE's, however, the more I reserched (Youtube, Google, myspace), most of those people performing these experiments are one guy in his garage trying to work out the possibilities with little scientific training or knowledge of chemical exchange, combustion or mass. I feel that the possibilities are availabe and it is possible that someone in the future may come up with a means of working out the various problems associated with this new technology. Yes, if it were possible today, some company (GM, Ford, etc.) would already be hard at work producing such vehicles and getting the jump on the competition instead for filing record breaking losses each quarter. This technology is new, and will require much in the way of reaserch and development before you can go to your local filling station and say "fill 'er up" with a quart of H2O. Who knows, what the future holds... as for myself I am crrently conducting research and exerimentation on this technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very intrigued at first at the pssibilities of HHO gas for vehiculiar transporation as a way to convert or modify existing ICE&#8217;s, however, the more I reserched (Youtube, Google, myspace), most of those people performing these experiments are one guy in his garage trying to work out the possibilities with little scientific training or knowledge of chemical exchange, combustion or mass. I feel that the possibilities are availabe and it is possible that someone in the future may come up with a means of working out the various problems associated with this new technology. Yes, if it were possible today, some company (GM, Ford, etc.) would already be hard at work producing such vehicles and getting the jump on the competition instead for filing record breaking losses each quarter. This technology is new, and will require much in the way of reaserch and development before you can go to your local filling station and say &#8220;fill &#8216;er up&#8221; with a quart of H2O. Who knows, what the future holds&#8230; as for myself I am crrently conducting research and exerimentation on this technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14253</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14253</guid>
		<description>I read the discussion with interest as the oil price is sky high. Hi Toni, how was the result from your friend on his test?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the discussion with interest as the oil price is sky high. Hi Toni, how was the result from your friend on his test?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14124</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14124</guid>
		<description>Ive been looking into this "HHO" device for a few hours now.  I am a natural born sceptic and love reading all the posts from my fellow scientific minds.  I know nothing about Chemistry but a lot about mechanical and Electrical theory.   
 my first point,  You are to focused at the H's and O's  Look at the whole Chemical reaction of the Atmosphere/gasoline Mixture (input and output) and then with the Extra H's and O.

   My point being  say our atmosphere was made of argon?  a gas motor would not work at all, right?    Hook up the HHO devise in this circumstance could combustion take place? resulting in an infinite power increase over no reaction at all. I don't think this Devise can  work burning its bi products as a standalone fuel source and be efficient.    But I think Bettering the atmosphere side of the equation of the air fuel combustion reaction COULD result in a better burn adding more power or mpg.   I can change the equation of the reaction taking place in my motor with additives like nitrous of water-methanol injection, and the result is more power.  (but yes I am Adding stored Fuel)  but wait...

  I currently (like ten of thousands of other motor heads) Inject Water with a 30 methanol into my motor,  I see 195hp gain on a 180 hp 2.0l motor when injecting water/meth mix.   I still see a HP increase when just injecting pure water!!!!!   All your old school Hot Rodders who've played with Superchargers now what I'm talking about.     I know why this is possible.   I'm lowering the chamber temps and increasing the compression ratio of the motor (water doesn't compress like Gasses do )   So all chemist you need to look at all the variables . 


Your right, in a test tube this doesn't work but in a motor it might.   look at all the variables.  

Whose to say God gave us the most efficient atmosphere to burn gasoline in? 

I get better gas mileage in the summer but make more power in the winter,  I also make more power at sea level?  Temperature, pressures are some variables to the MPG question.  look at everything they are doing. not just the equations of this stupid device with a match.   
  
My other point....   Has anyone ever analyzed the tailpipe emissions of a car equipped  with this to see if the output is indeed 'different',  meaning a meaningful reaction is taking place? 
or to see just what the emissions are?    
The auto makers can make REALLY High mpg cars,  but they cant make them comply with EPA emission  standards.   (Chinese made scooters that get 80mpg but pollute more than a 100 suv's,    http://wweek.com/editorial/3240/7867  .)


what if I generated electricity off my brakes to split water?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive been looking into this &#8220;HHO&#8221; device for a few hours now.  I am a natural born sceptic and love reading all the posts from my fellow scientific minds.  I know nothing about Chemistry but a lot about mechanical and Electrical theory.<br />
 my first point,  You are to focused at the H&#8217;s and O&#8217;s  Look at the whole Chemical reaction of the Atmosphere/gasoline Mixture (input and output) and then with the Extra H&#8217;s and O.</p>
<p>   My point being  say our atmosphere was made of argon?  a gas motor would not work at all, right?    Hook up the HHO devise in this circumstance could combustion take place? resulting in an infinite power increase over no reaction at all. I don&#8217;t think this Devise can  work burning its bi products as a standalone fuel source and be efficient.    But I think Bettering the atmosphere side of the equation of the air fuel combustion reaction COULD result in a better burn adding more power or mpg.   I can change the equation of the reaction taking place in my motor with additives like nitrous of water-methanol injection, and the result is more power.  (but yes I am Adding stored Fuel)  but wait&#8230;</p>
<p>  I currently (like ten of thousands of other motor heads) Inject Water with a 30 methanol into my motor,  I see 195hp gain on a 180 hp 2.0l motor when injecting water/meth mix.   I still see a HP increase when just injecting pure water!!!!!   All your old school Hot Rodders who&#8217;ve played with Superchargers now what I&#8217;m talking about.     I know why this is possible.   I&#8217;m lowering the chamber temps and increasing the compression ratio of the motor (water doesn&#8217;t compress like Gasses do )   So all chemist you need to look at all the variables . </p>
<p>Your right, in a test tube this doesn&#8217;t work but in a motor it might.   look at all the variables.  </p>
<p>Whose to say God gave us the most efficient atmosphere to burn gasoline in? </p>
<p>I get better gas mileage in the summer but make more power in the winter,  I also make more power at sea level?  Temperature, pressures are some variables to the MPG question.  look at everything they are doing. not just the equations of this stupid device with a match.   </p>
<p>My other point&#8230;.   Has anyone ever analyzed the tailpipe emissions of a car equipped  with this to see if the output is indeed &#8216;different&#8217;,  meaning a meaningful reaction is taking place?<br />
or to see just what the emissions are?<br />
The auto makers can make REALLY High mpg cars,  but they cant make them comply with EPA emission  standards.   (Chinese made scooters that get 80mpg but pollute more than a 100 suv&#8217;s,    <a href="http://wweek.com/editorial/3240/7867" rel="nofollow">http://wweek.com/editorial/3240/7867</a>  .)</p>
<p>what if I generated electricity off my brakes to split water?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14062</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-14062</guid>
		<description>The theory behind hho is simple.I'm not a chemical engineer but in my years of RnD in mechanical engineering I at least can figure this theory out at a glance. (to protect my company and my rep I'm not revealing 100% of the info but you can figure it out)First you use electroXXXX to seperate the molecules(h-h-o)you use metal plates in the water and run a charge from your battery to basically fry the h gas out of the water(it bubbles releasing ?(you guessed it!! Gas) thats 2parts hydrogen one part being h gas that is seperated and feeds into the intake vacuum caused by your moter. 2) the gas is burned in the fuel mixture just like adding nitrous to race cars for more horsepower.thus achieving better gas mileage.Very simple consept.You have to use more then water in the water reservoir and since your bypassing the oxygen fuel mixture YOU HAVE TO ADJUST THE OXYGEN INPUT to get optimal fuel efficincey.Thats where everybody does wrong.So to some it up YES YOU CAN GET 20% TO 50% MORE EFFICINCY.Due to the fact that I'm starting to make kits that are safer with relay switches and valves becouse it is dangerous ,becouse it is a flammable gas but so is gasoline!!!The car companies dont wanna mess with better gas milage bet you didnt know that imports get better mpg becouse they recycle the gas combustion!!Thus getting better exhaust emmisions as well.Well Im making my ford windstar run on it and Ill let you people know the results and like Stanley Meyers Ill make the info to tweak free so we can end our dependenced on FOSSIL fuels (MMM THAT WORD SOUNDS LIKE A LIMITED SUPPLY)but for now, Im designing as we speak, a safer system so I'm not responsible for what happens becouse there are alot of stupid people in the world( if you dont consider yourself stupid, then I'm not talking about you).IE;I'll be installing them through a franchised garage service and I bet people will forget to check and fill the water reservoir as they refuel.P.S. the water needs to be a mixture, so picture charging a battery and the s acid boils and you have to release that gas or vent it.So to some it up for benzmacx ,the energy first comes from your battery, charging the water then the h gas is sucked into your fuel, air,  and now hy gas mixture,and operates you ICE motor.saves petor gas becouse in theory gas,air,and liquid takes up space in your intake thus IT WORKS.Dont forget youll have to tweak the fuel mixture for optimal performance.By the way hy gas turns into WATER as emission, (chemistry 101,gas from liquid returns to its prior state when enclosed) .Maybe bypass a recycle collecter in the exhaust MMM I better get back to my project ( If your going to reply, keep it simple especially you students,I have engineering books to but it rolls of my head,so that other people can understands). The Law of Change
"A law of Physics establishes a proven function based on "preset" conditions...
Change anyone of the conditions and the law no longer applies" 
Stanley A. Meyer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theory behind hho is simple.I&#8217;m not a chemical engineer but in my years of RnD in mechanical engineering I at least can figure this theory out at a glance. (to protect my company and my rep I&#8217;m not revealing 100% of the info but you can figure it out)First you use electroXXXX to seperate the molecules(h-h-o)you use metal plates in the water and run a charge from your battery to basically fry the h gas out of the water(it bubbles releasing ?(you guessed it!! Gas) thats 2parts hydrogen one part being h gas that is seperated and feeds into the intake vacuum caused by your moter. 2) the gas is burned in the fuel mixture just like adding nitrous to race cars for more horsepower.thus achieving better gas mileage.Very simple consept.You have to use more then water in the water reservoir and since your bypassing the oxygen fuel mixture YOU HAVE TO ADJUST THE OXYGEN INPUT to get optimal fuel efficincey.Thats where everybody does wrong.So to some it up YES YOU CAN GET 20% TO 50% MORE EFFICINCY.Due to the fact that I&#8217;m starting to make kits that are safer with relay switches and valves becouse it is dangerous ,becouse it is a flammable gas but so is gasoline!!!The car companies dont wanna mess with better gas milage bet you didnt know that imports get better mpg becouse they recycle the gas combustion!!Thus getting better exhaust emmisions as well.Well Im making my ford windstar run on it and Ill let you people know the results and like Stanley Meyers Ill make the info to tweak free so we can end our dependenced on FOSSIL fuels (MMM THAT WORD SOUNDS LIKE A LIMITED SUPPLY)but for now, Im designing as we speak, a safer system so I&#8217;m not responsible for what happens becouse there are alot of stupid people in the world( if you dont consider yourself stupid, then I&#8217;m not talking about you).IE;I&#8217;ll be installing them through a franchised garage service and I bet people will forget to check and fill the water reservoir as they refuel.P.S. the water needs to be a mixture, so picture charging a battery and the s acid boils and you have to release that gas or vent it.So to some it up for benzmacx ,the energy first comes from your battery, charging the water then the h gas is sucked into your fuel, air,  and now hy gas mixture,and operates you ICE motor.saves petor gas becouse in theory gas,air,and liquid takes up space in your intake thus IT WORKS.Dont forget youll have to tweak the fuel mixture for optimal performance.By the way hy gas turns into WATER as emission, (chemistry 101,gas from liquid returns to its prior state when enclosed) .Maybe bypass a recycle collecter in the exhaust MMM I better get back to my project ( If your going to reply, keep it simple especially you students,I have engineering books to but it rolls of my head,so that other people can understands). The Law of Change<br />
&#8220;A law of Physics establishes a proven function based on &#8220;preset&#8221; conditions&#8230;<br />
Change anyone of the conditions and the law no longer applies&#8221;<br />
Stanley A. Meyer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toni</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-13963</link>
		<dc:creator>toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-13963</guid>
		<description>is it just another scam?


www.water4gas.com is one site that shows how to put things together.
I drive a Nissan Titan and everytime I put gas it costs me $100. If it would save me $20-$30 on each fill-up I would probably spend $200 to get this system.

Of course all their claims on the website cannot be taken as a fact. I would have to see one installed, drive the car and see how much money it saves. No company offers money back if your efficiency does not go up and most companies sell only Info on how to make your own. No mass production from any big name company yet.

Why doesnt any big company make it?
Too risky. They would have to sell it at $400-600 installed and if gas prices go down nobody will buy them, therefore all investment in the production line will go through the window.


My friend just got a system and will install it on a Toyota truck. I will let you know in two weeks how it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it just another scam?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.water4gas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.water4gas.com</a> is one site that shows how to put things together.<br />
I drive a Nissan Titan and everytime I put gas it costs me $100. If it would save me $20-$30 on each fill-up I would probably spend $200 to get this system.</p>
<p>Of course all their claims on the website cannot be taken as a fact. I would have to see one installed, drive the car and see how much money it saves. No company offers money back if your efficiency does not go up and most companies sell only Info on how to make your own. No mass production from any big name company yet.</p>
<p>Why doesnt any big company make it?<br />
Too risky. They would have to sell it at $400-600 installed and if gas prices go down nobody will buy them, therefore all investment in the production line will go through the window.</p>
<p>My friend just got a system and will install it on a Toyota truck. I will let you know in two weeks how it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benzmacx</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-13876</link>
		<dc:creator>benzmacx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-13876</guid>
		<description>This is not energy independence!!!  This technology needs to get energy from somewhere!  I say, what is the point of using this to power an ICE??  There are two energy conversions there, one of which is just about the least efficient thing we have.  

If you are going to change the world, change the world.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not energy independence!!!  This technology needs to get energy from somewhere!  I say, what is the point of using this to power an ICE??  There are two energy conversions there, one of which is just about the least efficient thing we have.  </p>
<p>If you are going to change the world, change the world.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sudhir Gaud</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-13870</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudhir Gaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeta.com/blog/2008/06/03/hho-oxyhydrogen/#comment-13870</guid>
		<description>I am not knowledgeable enough about energy saving technologies to comment on the viability of this, however I will take it for granted that its legit based on what i've read from others with technical expertise in the field.  I think it is of the utmost importance to promote all forms of energy independence in order as right now the U.S. is helplessly dependent on duplicitous and despotic regimes like Saudi Arabia and this is terrible for national security.  This is commonly stated but I feel like people don't really understand the scope of the problem, It is one of the greatest ironies that Saudi Arabia is practically the epicenter of global terrorism and yet we cannot stand up to them or take a hard stance against them diplomatically because of oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not knowledgeable enough about energy saving technologies to comment on the viability of this, however I will take it for granted that its legit based on what i&#8217;ve read from others with technical expertise in the field.  I think it is of the utmost importance to promote all forms of energy independence in order as right now the U.S. is helplessly dependent on duplicitous and despotic regimes like Saudi Arabia and this is terrible for national security.  This is commonly stated but I feel like people don&#8217;t really understand the scope of the problem, It is one of the greatest ironies that Saudi Arabia is practically the epicenter of global terrorism and yet we cannot stand up to them or take a hard stance against them diplomatically because of oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
